Friday, August 31, 2012

Isaac prompts jump in gas prices - YNN Hudson Valley

It's Labor Day weekend, and that means many of you will be hitting the roads to enjoy one last summer getaway. But, it's going to be a more costly trip than usual. YNN's Megan Cruz spoke to experts about why a storm miles south of us may be to blame.

'); if(infobox=='True' && ShowInfoBox_l597714_1==false){ jQuery("#player_infobarl597714_1").trigger('click'); ShowInfoBox_l597714_1==true; } }; if (false) { $.setup_player(Play_Conf); } //info bar setup jQuery('#player_infobarl597714_1').click(function() { var $info =jQuery('#player_info_contentl597714_1'); if($info.text()!=''){ var $content = jQuery('div',$info); //min heigth var min = $content.css('min-height'); var max = $content.css('max-height'); $info.slideToggle(600); ShowInfoBox_l597714_1=!ShowInfoBox_l597714_1; } }); });

COLONIE, N.Y. -- "Don't want to be disappointed," said Colonie resident Tom Clauford. That's why when he fills up his tank, he avoids looking at the price.

"My truck - it likes gas!"

Many say they're sick of watching the dollars climb.

"I go through $150, $200 a week," said Dave Barnett from Colonie.

"It costs me about $75 to fill up each time," said Clayton Wood, also from Colonie.

And this weekend, they'll be spending even more, not just because of Labor Day.

"The production has been halted for a while and it will remain that way for at least a few more weeks," said Dr. Khalid Mehtabdin, an economics professor at The College of Saint Rose. He's talking about the oil and gas companies along the Gulf Coast. They've stopped production because of Isaac, meaning less supply to meet the holiday demand.

"Because there is no output for production, that means there's going to be demand there anyway," Mehtabdin said.

Over the past week, the national average for a regular gallon of gas has gone up $.11 from $3.72 to $3.83 according to AAA.

Here in Albany, the price of a regular gallon of gas has gone up $.05 from last week, to $3.91.

Regardless, AAA expects more than 30 million people to hit the roads this Labor Day weekend. That's a 3 percent rise from last year.

"Just need time to get a way," said Barnett. "You don't want to lose out! Everybody needs time off."

"I try not to make it a make or break thing for decisions and plans you make," said Wood. "It's just something you deal with."

"I hope they don't go up much more," said Clauford. "I mean, $4 is kind of the tipping point."

Mehtabdin says the good news is this recent spike in prices is shortlived, as the rigs and refineries will gradually gear back up as Isaac moves out.

Unfortunately not in time for this unofficial end to summer.

Lenovo Unleashes Windows 8 Laptops, All-in-One PCs - All Things Digital

Yesterday, Lenovo revealed its refreshed IdeaPad S series of laptops, but the China-based PC maker has more â€" a lot more â€" up its sleeve.

Lenovo IdeaPad U510 Ultrabook

At the IFA Consumer Electronics Show in Berlin, Germany, today, Lenovo announced a slew of Windows 8 products, including five new laptops and four all-in-one PCs.

The IdeaPad U510 Ultrabook is for those who don’t want to sacrifice the features of a laptop but desire a more portable design. Equipped with a 15-inch display, it measures 0.82 inch thick and weighs 4.8 pounds, which is on the heavier side for an Ultrabook.

However, you can configure it with a DVD or Blu-ray disc drive. Other options include a third-generation Intel Core i7 processor and one-terabyte hard disk drive. Lenovo estimates the Ultabook’s battery life at six hours.

The IdeaPad U510 will be available in September; pricing starts at $679.

Lenovo IdeaPad Z400

Also shipping in September is the IdeaPad Z500 for $549 and above. It’s not an Ultrabook, but Lenovo touts it as being 25 percent slimmer than a standard laptop without sacrificing any power or graphics performance.

The Z500 has a 15.6-inch LED-backlit HD display; you can also opt for a 14-inch screen with the Z400 ($549; shipping in November). Both are configurable with third-generation Intel processors and NVIDIA graphics technology and come in a variety of colors, including white, brown, pink and blue.

Next up are the IdeaPad Y400 and Y500. Designed for mobile gaming and multimedia, the Y400 and Y500 offer more graphics power, increased storage space and an additional fan for cooling to handle heavy tasks, such as editing video and playing games. The Y400 has a 14-inch widescreen HD display, while the Y500 has a 15.6-inch display, and both offer third-generation Intel processors, backlit keyboards and JBL speakers and Dolby technology for enhanced sound.

Lenovo IdeaPad Y400

The IdeaPad Y400 and Y500 will ship in October with prices starting at $649.

Lenovo IdeaCentre A520

Finally, if you’re in the market for an all-in-one PC, the IdeaCentre A520 comes with a 23-inch, 1080p HD multitouch screen with IPS technology for wider viewing angles. The display can also be tilted between five and 90 degrees and at the higher end can be built with an Intel Core i7 processor, a 1TB hard drive and a Blu-ray Disc drive.

Lenovo’s B Series all-in-one PCs kick the entertainment level up a notch with 3-D displays, and each model comes with two pairs of 3-D glasses â€" the B340 and B345 have 21.5-inch touchscreens, and the B545 has a 23-inch touchscreen. In addition to the aforementioned Intel processors, the series can be built with AMD quad-core processors and the B340 includes an option for an NVIDIA graphics processor. If you want access to HDTV, a TV tuner is also available for extra.

The IdeaCentre A520 has an availability date of October and costs $999 for the base model. The IdeaCentre B340 and B345 also go on sale in October and start at $599. The B545 is available now for $699 and above.

Kindle Fire won't go big to take on iPad - CNET

Amazon unveils Kindle Fire

Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos announced the Kindle Fire, the company's first tablet computer, at an event in New York last year.

(Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET)

Amazon plans to double down on the 7-inch tablet market with two new Kindle Fire models, CNET has learned.

Despite speculation that Amazon was preparing a larger 8.9 or 10-inch version, the company will only unveil a new 7-inch Kindle Fire and a slightly revamped version of the original tablet in an event scheduled for next week, according to a person who has seen the products.

The new Kindle Fire tablets are crucial in keeping Amazon competitive in the tablet business, which already faces tougher competition from Google's own Nexus 7 and the prospects of a lower-priced, smaller iPad Mini from Apple. They play into Amazon's broader strategy of playing a more significant role in the mobile consumer world.

Amazon vaulted into the tablet market a year ago with the Kindle Fire, with $199 price tag that many felt was the most innovative aspect of the product. The attractive price tag, access to Amazon Prime content, and a featured spot on the online retailer's home page generated a lot of buzz for the product, with many believing it would end up being the No. 2 tablet player behind Apple.

Unlike other equipment makers, which generate their profit off of the hardware itself, Amazon views the Kindle Fire as another storefront -- one that consumers can take with them wherever they go. As a result, it was able to offer the tablet at such a low price. The company can make up the difference on books, DVDs, and other products that consumers end up ordering through the tablet. But with the emergence of several other low-cost tablets, including the $199 Nexus 7, its price advantage has been negated.

Rather than expand its potential market and launch a larger Kindle Fire to compete against the iPad, Amazon will stick with the two 7-inch tablets. The company said earlier this week that the original Kindle Fire was "sold out," a convenient announcement given the upcoming event next week.

But Amazon appears to be making room for a slightly upgraded version of the original Kindle Fire, which includes a new user interface. While the person didn't have any pricing information, the company will almost certainly charge a lower price for the device than the original.

The more exciting product is the new higher-end 7-inch Kindle Fire model, which will feature more hardware improvements, including a faster processor, a camera, physical volume controls, and an HDMI port. It will also have larger storage capacity, but it will still not be expandable. There is no pricing information on the device.

The Verge posted a picture of the new Kindle Fire yesterday.

It's unclear whether the two versions will have different names. CNET contacted Amazon for comment, and we'll update the story when the company responds.

Amazon could also have a larger Kindle Fire in the works, but any such product won't be announced at the event next week.

While many had expected Amazon to lead the non-Apple tablet pack with its lower priced tablet, Samsung Electronics, with its lineup of Galaxy Tab devices, is actually the second-largest player in the world, thanks in part to its global distribution. The Kindle Fire isn't in nearly as many markets. Samsung had 9.2 percent of the global tablet market in the second quarter, while Amazon had 4.2 percent of the share, according to IHS iSuppli.

Still, Amazon has taken steps to expand its presence overseas, including launching its app store in several new European markets. Rather than rely on Google Play, Amazon directs Kindle Fire users to its own Amazon Appstore.

The expanded availability and a lineup of two Kindle Fire tablets at varying -- but still low -- prices could make Amazon a major player this holiday season.

David Carnoy contributed to this story.

Japan judge dismisses Apple suit against Samsung - Christian Science Monitor

A week after Apple scored a major victory over Samsung, a similar suit has been tossed out by a Japanese court. 

By Matthew Shaer / August 31, 2012

A Samsung Galaxy Tab tablet computer is seen in a South Korean store. This week, a judge in Japan has tossed an Apple lawsuit which claimed Samsung infringed on a key iPhone and iPad-related patent.

Reuters

Enlarge

You win some, you lose some. 

Skip to next paragraph

Recent posts

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

A week after a California jury ordered Samsung to pay Apple approximately $1 billion in damages, a judge in Japan has dismissed a similar claim â€" also filed by Apple â€" against Samsung. According to the Washington Post, Tokyo District Judge Tamotsu Shoji ruled today that a media synchronization feature on Samsung tablets and smartphones did not violate Apple patents. 

"The defendant's products do not seem like they used the same technology as the plaintiff's products so we turn down the complaints made by [Apple]," Shoji told the court. 

The verdict was welcome relief for Samsung, which saw shares in the company temporarily slump in the wake of the Aug. 24 ruling in California. As the Financial Times points out, the iPhone has been the most popular smartphone in Japan for years, although the Samsung Galaxy line has more recently challenged the supremacy of the Apple handset. An adverse ruling would have hurt Samsung's clout in Japan. 

In fact, Taurus Investment Securities analyst Kim Hyung Sik told Bloomberg, the ruling could have international implications for Samsung, which has been sued by Apple in several countries, including Australia and England. "This will likely turn the tide in favor of Samsung," Hyung Sik said. "Samsung had this win in a country that’s strong at intellectual property. The mood is turning positive for Samsung."

Last week, a California court ruled that Samsung had infringed on a range of Apple patents pertaining to the iPad and iPhone. Apple is currently seeking injunctions against eight Samsung handsets that use the affected patents. 

For more on how technology intersects daily life, follow us on Twitter @venturenaut.

Google+ is now an Enterprise Social Network? Who knew? - Forbes

Google (NASDAQ:GOOG) launches Google+ for businesses. Its entry into the enterprise social networking (ESN) market adds new collaboration features to Google Apps â€" the cloud-computing office service â€" including 10-way desktop videoconferencing with real-time editing.

It also adds all the security tools you’d expect, to help IT help users to keep sensitive data inside the organization.

On the one hand, Google doesn’t seem to know what to call this new thing: Google+ For Work? Google+ Enterprise? Or is it just a part of good ol’ Google Apps?

On The Other Hand, this could be strong competition for Microsoft‘s more expensive Office 365 service.

Google Apps hangout


With a little background, Juan Carlos Perez reports:

Google first indicated last year that it planned to release an enterprise version of Google+. … Google+ was launched as a consumer social networking site in mid-2011, but [now]Google is joining the hot ESN trend [with] employee profiles…streams, microblogging, document sharing…blogging, discussion groups and…communities.
…
[It's] critical for Google Apps, since ESN by now is considered an essential element in enterprise collaboration suites. … Google+ is also gaining IT administration controls to…establish policies for usage and content sharing.


Fruzsina Eördögh is easy for you to say:

These new features include…videoconferencing…turning Google “hangouts” into business meetings [and] private, intra-office Google+ posts. (Think…Facebook for the workplace.) …”restricted posts” can’t be reshared outside the organization.
…
The new features are available for free until 2014, but the company has not announced what the eventual pricing will be. … Google says it plans to roll out more business features.
…
Google+ hasn’t been able to significantly challenge Facebook in the consumer…space, but the enterprise market is…wide open.


Google’s Clay Bavor is “excited to move into a full preview mode”:

Web-based collaboration and social tools have dramatically changed the way people connect. … So today we’re launching an initial set of Google+ features designed specifically for businesses.
…
Google Apps users now have more control over the content they post to Google+…when you create a post, you [can] share it with specific partners [and/or] colleagues outside the organization…if you choose. …administrators can now set company-wide defaults.
…
These latest business features…are just a start. We have a lot more planned for the coming months, including a mobile version…for enterprise users and more administrative controls.


But Barb Darrow says it “should come as no surprise”:

Google [is] linking Google+ to everything and tightening ties between [with] the Google Apps suite. … There are the usual nods to IT. … And Google Apps users will now get more control.
…
Google Apps, the company’s response to the Microsoft Office juggernaut, used to be perceived as a lightweight…but it has gotten considerable traction and has forced Microsoft to respond with Office 365.


Yet Quentin Hardy is intrigued:

It’s still early…but it’s easy to see how this could be an efficient way to [hold] a virtual meeting, collaborate…and embed in a calendar the future work commitments and follow-up that result.
…
There are a number of ways to look at [it]. The sour grapes version is that Google Plus isn’t getting anything like the buzz or traffic of Facebook, so Google is [trying] to make the service relevant. Less judgmentally, it’s another sign of the consumer technology drifting into the enterprise.
…
While business looks like the follower here, [it] may make social networking more valuable than it is in the consumer world. … We may use Facebook a lot to talk about our lives, but few of us click on the ads there.


Meanwhile, Cynthia Boris can’t wait to give it a spin:

Google+ has been looking for a way to distinguish itself from the competition. … This time, I think they got it right. … The concept is this: instead of only using your Google+ Page to talk to your customers, why not use it to talk to your co-workers?
…
The big news is how you can use Hangouts to run meetings. … The best part, you can open a Google Doc in the Hangout so everyone can work on [it] in real time. … I’m always looking for better ways to collaborate on projects and this is it. … It sounds too easy to be true.


Now read this:


is an independent analyst, writer and editor. You can Google-Plus him at , follow him as @richi on Twitter, pretend to be his friend at Facebook.com/richij or just use boring old email: fs@richij.com. A cross-functional IT geek since 1985, Richi also publishes a full profile and disclosure of his industry affiliations.

Apple's iPhone chip salvation is close at hand - ZDNet

It doesn't matter how good the iPhone 5 turns out to be: Apple can't sell it if it can't build it. It's not alone: this is the cold equation facing many mobile device manufacturers in the coming months, as supply problems dog the chip manufacturers.

iPhone
How can Apple stay ahead in the mobile game and ensure a steady chip supply?

The riskiest products are the highest-performance smartphones and tablets, which drive new chip technologies â€" and are thus most susceptible to the delays that blunt the cutting edge. It's a rare point of vulnerability for Apple, which relies on massive sales of top-end products and likes very much to maintain absolute control over its supply chain.

Nobody doubts Apple wants to lock down its own chip supplies. It has more options than most. For example, the company has been shopping for semiconductor expertise over the past few years, leading some to suggest it may go as far as setting up its own silicon foundry.

These are insanely expensive: Taiwanese company TSMC has spent nearly $10bn (£6.3bn) on its latest plant. Apple has enough cash to buy anything it likes â€" but it can't change the laws of semiconductor physics. If it decided to build its own fab from scratch, it would be at least three to five years before it came onstream, and to be competitive, it would have to be cutting edge.

Existing chip companies find that hard enough, even with decades of experience, and the next stage in chip production â€" sub-20nm geometries on 450mm wafers â€" is doubly challenging. Starting up under those conditions would be like starting a space programme with a manned mission to Jupiter.

Other options

Its existing relationships aren't ideal, either. One major supplier is Samsung, which has to hurt. Other suppliers like TSMC are keenly aware that while Apple is the biggest company in the world, the mobile market is bigger yet, and they aren't prepared to sacrifice other customers in exchange for the Cupertino billions. That's despite it claiming that it has largely fixed its own 28nm fab problems and should be able to meet demand by the end of the year.

Apple's ideal chip partner would be one already leading the pack in fab but one without a major mobile presence

Another option would be to work with the Chinese government, which has already invested heavily in chip fabs and would doubtless be delighted to cut a very favourable deal with Apple in exchange for gaining access to competitive production techniques. That wouldn't solve the problems Apple would face in starting up its own fab, though, and partnerships with authoritarian regimes come with risks all their own.

There are other caveats. The chip industry, and in particular the mobile market, is a vast and thorny thicket of cross-licensing, patent barriers and other IP issues. And, once you've built your own chip fab, you lose a lot of flexibility: it's a lot easier to switch suppliers if you need to change course, than to turn your own supertanker around.

So Apple's ideal chip partner would be one already leading the pack in fab but one without a major mobile presence. It would be one with lots of key intellectual property, and masses of experience in working with the networking, storage and processing techniques that stitch together modern IT. It would be sweeter still if that partner had recently cooled on a long-term relationship with one of Apple's major competitors.

And if that partner was just 10 miles away from Cupertino, just the other side of Ponderosa Park, in â€" say â€" Santa Clara... well, that would be just perfect.

How Apple could build a $249 8" tablet and beat the Nexus 7 at its own game - Ars Technica

A mock-up of a potential iPad mini design compared to an iPad, iPhone, Nexus 7, and Kindle Fire.

Apple's rumored iPad mini could very well be a shrunken-down iPad 2, according to analysis by Instapaper developer Marco Arment. He recently discovered references to two previously unknown iPad models in logs that track device usage among Instapaper users, which suggest Apple may soon release two new variations of the iPad 2. Arment theorizes that these models in fact represent two variations of the rumored iPad mini, reportedly launching in October, and re-engineered to be less expensive than the existing iPad 2 model selling for $399.

"It's a textbook Tim Cook supply-chain move: selling the last generation's hardware at a lower price point to expand marketshare," Arment wrote on his blog.

Developers often collect anonymous usage statistics for their apps, which help them understand, among other things, what hardware is popular with users. With this data, developers can decide when to add features that only work on newer hardware, for instance, or when it's a good time to drop support for older OSes or hardware.

Arment discovered references in his usage logs to two new iPad model identifiers on Thursdayâ€"iPad2,5 and iPad2,6. Apple typically uses the numeric X,X model designation to refer to major revisions and minor revisions, respectively. So, iPad2,1, iPad2,2, and iPad2,3 refer to the original WiFi, GSM, and CDMA versions of the iPad 2. iPad2,4 refers to a version of the WiFi-only iPad 2 with a 32nm version of the A5 processor which Apple still sells for $399.

The 32mm die shrink of the A5 processor gives the iPad2,4 a 20-30 percent increase in battery life over the original iPad 2 model, which came equipped with a 45nm process A5 processor. Coincidentally, the iPad mini's screen is rumored to be 7.85" diagonally, a 20 percent reduction in screen size. Presumably, the smaller screen would mean a 20 percent smaller case, which could only contain a 20 percent smaller battery. Effectively, the 32nm processor should allow Apple to offer a smaller tablet with the same 10-hour battery as its larger 9.7" cousins.

The iPad mini's rumored 7.85" screen, which sources for Bloomberg said will be manufactured by LG and AU Optronics, is expected to stay at the same 1024x768 pixel resolution as the original iPad and iPad 2. The expected size and resolution makes sense to us for a couple reasons. For one, AU Optronics doesn't have an established reputation for manufacturing panels with the high-pixel densities required for a "retina"-class display. Also, maintaining the same resolution as earlier iPads means no changes are needed to existing software. Finally, some Apple watchers have argued that a 20 percent reduction in physical screen size shouldn't present usability concerns for standard iPad interface elements; that assertion seems plausible.

Two new model numbers suggest that Apple will offer a WiFi model as well as one equipped with some type of 3G or 4G cellular connection. It seems likely that Apple could be planning to use a second-generation combined GSM, CDMA, and LTE chipset from Qualcomm, which is also expected to debut in the next-generation iPhone. The combined volume between the iPhone and iPad mini should keep costs reasonable as well.

As Arment suggests, the combination of older hardware should allow Apple to target a price of $249. That's not quite as low as the Nexus 7's category-busting price of $199, but Apple does have brand recognition on its side when it comes to the tablet market. Google has already admitted that the Nexus 7 makes essentially no profit, and other Android tablet makers can't be happy at the prospect of competing with effectively zero margin. A $249 iPad mini could potentially take some of the wind out of the Nexus 7's sails while still contributing a healthy margin to Apple's already impressive bottom line.